Jill Stein Bribed By Clinton to Steal the Election…(Can anyone make sense of this???)

~@ This is bizarre…. I too, could not find reasoning in Stein raising money for a recount?… My first reaction was that it would only benefit Hillary…. Very difficult to believe that Stein would be involved with Hillary???… Confused beyond belief!

The Mysterious Case Of Jill Stein’s Surging Recount Costs

Just yesterday we noted that Jill Stein was acting on behalf of Hillary Clinton to raise money for recounts in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania.  As we noted then, we continue to be astonished by the amount of money flowing into the fundraising campaign and would love to see which of Hillary’s mega donors have spent the most on the effort…somehow we suspect this isn’t just a “grassroots organizing” effort as Stein described it.

So, in less than 1 day, Jill Stein raised over $3mm, which is more than the $2mm needed to force a recount in Wisconsin.  While she attributed the accomplishment to “the power of grassroots organizing,” we would tend to be a little more skeptical and would love to see exactly where those donations came from.  Then again, maybe we’re wrong and there really are just that many disaffected snowflakes out there willing to blow their money on an extreme long shot.

But, today a new mystery has emerged in Stein’s fundraising efforts.  Apparently, the more money she raises the more expensive the recount effort becomes.  Courtesy of the Wayback Machine we have the following snapshots from her fundraising page over the past couple of days:

November 24, 2016 at 3:46AMIn the beginning, Stein figured she needed a total of $2.5mm to fund her recount efforts.  That figure included $2.2mm for the actual filing fees and presumably another $0.3mm for legal fees and other costs.

JS

November 24, 2016 at 1:20PMThen, just 12 hours later, after the cash just kept flowing in, Stein figured she needed at least another $2mm as her fundraising goal was raised to $4.5mm in total.  Of course, the filing fees of $2.2mm didn’t change but the “attorney’s fees” apparently surged by about 300% and the total costs of the effort skyrocketed to $6-7mm.

JS

 

November 25, 2016 at 6:11AM – Now, just this morning as Stein approaches $5mm in total donations, her overall fundraising goal has surged once again and now stands at $7mm.

JS

 

So, with nearly $5mm raised so far, the question is no longer whether recounts will occur in WI, MI and PA but just how much Jill Stein will be able to drain from the pockets of disaffected Hillary supporters to fund her long-shot efforts.

All that said, here is Jill Stein admitting to CNN that she has absolutely no evidence of election hacking….even though she asks that you please keep sending your money anyway.

 

And another where she says she would have challenged the election result even if Hillary won…though somehow we suspect she wouldn’t have been able to raise quite so much money under that scenario.

 

And finally we leave you with this latest epic rant from PJW on the whole situation:

 

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Jill Stein Bribed By Clinton to Steal the Election…(Can anyone make sense of this???)

  1. Joe says:

    Jill is raising money for her next run. She probably does not intend to do a recount, and she probably gets to keep the money if there is no recount.

  2. lozzafun says:

    That would be a dirty trick … Cannot count on any for honesty, evidently…..

  3. The global Green Party movement (of which I am a member – here in New Zealand) is not about Hilary Clinton. It’s about fairness and transparency. There is massive and widespread vote rigging and election fraud in the US (well documented by Greg Palast, Black Box voting and others) – which was most apparently earlier in the year with the Democratic primaries.

    The main purpose of the re-counts is to

    1. Raise the profile of the US electoral fraud issue.
    2. Raise the profile of the Green Party (which was essential blacked out by the corporate media during the elections.
    3. Improve the fundraising capacity of the Green Party.

    I know it looks fishy to raise the fundraising goals in the middle of a campaign but I don’t think the Green Party leaders had any idea how strong the response would be.

    I do fundraising for the NZ Green Party and this is a common fundraising strategy. The legal fees of the recount will be immense and it will be impossible to raise the money if the recount doesn’t change the final result (which I suspect it won’t – they have already done a recount in Michigan.

    Stein has pledged to use all the funds on the recount – and to return any funds that are leftover (there won’t be after legal fees are paid.

  4. lozzafun says:

    Actually, there is a disclaimer on the petition … to the effect that there is NO guarantee that the funds would be used for recount- money remaining would be used to train green party members for local elections/positions….

    Not saying that I do not believe rigging occurs… certainly I do as I have posted extensively on the issue… However, why is the recount only in states that Clinton lost and NOT a move for a FULL investigation on rigging that has affected the entire election??… It would feel more reasonable to the American Public, less fishy… It appears they do NOT want the States that Clinton won, to be scrutinized… WHich means that a PARTIAL RECOUNT will definitely not tell the whole story…

    Now it has come out that members of the Clinton Campaign are working on it WITH Stein…. This is definitely fishy!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s